Be prepared to say “no” If someone wants you to read my paper. Do not be shy to share specifics, but be careful not to be hostile. Be sure to include plagiarism. Learn how to write a high-quality review. Then, you can use it to find the best writing aid or even hire a professional editor to make the paper more professional. Do you really want to read documents that have many errors?

It is not a problem to decline a review of your research paper

When a journal asks you to read a piece, be sure to state the perspective that you will bring to the review. Remember, your opinion might not be as important in the same way as that of the editor and if you’re not sure whether your article will merit consideration, don’t be afraid to ask for clarification. Generally, reviewers should write in a friendly and courteous style. Keep in mind that the editor is aware of your name. If you’re uncomfortable with this writing style then you must tell them “no.”

The APA Publications and Communications Board offers a seminar for those who want to be a peer-reviewer. In addition to the on-line tutorials and workshops, you are also able to attend an event at APA Annual Convention to learn about the process of becoming a peer-reviewer. By attending the session where you’ll be able to learn about the entire process from beginning up to the end. It will also allow you to meet other reviewers and inquire about questions. It is also possible to find the most suitable places to conduct your studies.

Please be precise in your remarks.

Make sure you are as exact as you can while creating your critique. Write about one or two specific aspects of the paper and include all citations of supporting documents. Other sections may be included. If you leave comments, be sure to specify what specific areas you considered to be troublesome or beneficial. If possible, mention the name of a particular reviewer, if you feel it is necessary. In the text, include the page or section’s number.

Make sure you address any critiques made by the reviewer in your article. Identify the reasons you disagree with their suggestions and then back your arguments with a reference. The reviewers may miss crucial aspects, or only see an insignificant portion of information. It is important to address each inquiry in depth. Your answer will probably be accepted if your response is more exact. It also helps when you tackle each aspect individually, and not just in general.

Be tough when you see the blatant plagiarism

Plagiarism may lead to retraction or modification of scientific documents. Marya Zilberberg from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst recounts her experiences when she found out that her research paper was plagiarized. Find out more about her experience and the way she was able to get the satisfaction she deserved. No matter if your work was plagiarized or otherwise There are steps you can take to guarantee your satisfaction.

Researchers must authenticate the sources they use. While some cultures may not view authentication as vital for citing source sources, it is an important part of global academic codes. Plagiarism is more common in people who are not native English users who experience more difficulty transmitting technical information English. To avoid plagiarising in those who are not native English language users should comply with certain ethical guidelines and requirements for citation. In addition, the advent of technology has increased the likelihood of plagiarism. Since it is easy to copy and paste information from the internet, research colleagues have the ability to steal and re-write information in their papers.

Your remarks should not be hostile

Reviewers’ aim should provide a professional and helpful service and not to be negative. While you have the right to be angry, do not do so by slamming the newspaper or the author. Your review should be thorough and your opinion should be founded on factual information. A summary of the paper is a good way to convey your understanding of the work and highlight aspects which the writer may have missed.

If you are seeking clarification, keep in mind that the person asking for clarification often has an excellent reason to ask. The reviewer may not have comprehended or followed an analytical procedure or step. No matter the reason for asking to clarify something, don’t be hostile. Instead, consider your reviewer’s request as an way to improve the work. In the event that the reviewer is truly unclear or simply unsure, it is important to be attentive to what they are saying.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.